Strategy · Building a portfolio · October 2026
Buy, hold, refinance, redeploy. A governed portfolio compounds faster than buy-and-hold, and the rules are what keep it safe.
After-sale net worth at Year 10, starting from C$600,000 (illustrative)
The bottom line
On C$600,000 of starting capital, a disciplined 3-year flywheel reaches about C$3.19M of after-sale net worth by Year 10 (18.2% IRR). Leveraged buy-and-hold reaches C$2.18M (13.8%), and a 60/40 portfolio C$0.93M (4.5%).
The edge arrives late. Recycling costs money first, so the 3-year cycle trails buy-and-hold at Year 3. It also depends almost entirely on the rules that stop it.
The ungoverned 80% version promoted in many courses shows C$4.82M in the base case, and the worst result of any strategy in a severe downturn.
These results assume C$1,800 rents on C$150,000-per-door buildings, an 8.4% cap rate. If rents are closer to C$1,540, the 10-year flywheel figures fall by roughly C$0.7–0.8M.
What we compared
| Strategy | How it works |
|---|---|
| Leveraged buy-and-hold | Buy what the capital allows at Year 0, hold, amortize, bank the cash flow. 75% at purchase. |
| Flywheel, 5-year cycle | Refinance seasoned assets at each 5-year maturity and redeploy into more 2–4 door properties. 75% LTV, governed. |
| Flywheel, 3-year cycle | The same on 3-year terms and refinance cycles. Governed by the same tests. |
| Aggressive 80% | Maximum LTV, refinance every 3 years whatever the coverage, thin reserves. Ungoverned. |
| 60/40 balanced | Stocks and bonds, rebalanced. 4.5% net after fees. |
Results at 3, 5 and 10 years
| Strategy | Year 3 | Year 5 | Year 10 | 10-yr IRR | Doors | Y10 LTV | Y10 DSCR | Y10 cash flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buy-and-hold | C$915k | C$1,226k | C$2,182k | 13.8% | 10 | 43.2% | 2.11× | C$80k |
| Flywheel 5-yr | C$917k | C$1,186k | C$3,077k | 17.8% | 32 | 60.5% | 1.73× | C$206k |
| Flywheel 3-yr | C$867k | C$1,290k | C$3,194k | 18.2% | 43 | 70.8% | 1.56× | C$235k |
| Aggressive 80% | C$949k | C$1,594k | C$4,822k | 23.2% | 87 | 75.9% | 1.45× | C$415k |
| 60/40 balanced | C$685k | C$748k | C$932k | 4.5% | – | – | – | – |
Net worth after 3.3% sale costs on all property. Principal paydown counted once, through the lower loan balance.
The 3-year flywheel sits at C$867k against C$915k for buy-and-hold. It has just paid closing costs and refinance fees, and the new doors haven’t earned anything yet.
It overtakes buy-and-hold (C$1,290k vs C$1,226k). The 5-year cycle has just recycled, so it shows the same dip.
43 doors against 10, with about 2.9 times the cash flow. The price is a higher LTV (70.8% vs 43.2%) and a lower DSCR (1.56× vs 2.11×). Reaching that many doors also tests lenders’ limits, so the financing ladder has to be built in advance.
Equity velocity
Buy-and-hold has a hidden decay problem. As the loan amortizes and the property appreciates, equity piles up while income grows only with rents. Return on equity falls from about 33% in Year 1 to about 16% by Year 10. Each governed refinance puts that “lazy” equity back to work and resets it toward 30%.
| Source of recycled capital, 10 years | Flywheel 5-yr | Flywheel 3-yr | What it really is |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refinance: amortization-created equity | C$103k | C$335k | Tenants’ rent paid this down. Re-borrowing it restores the debt. |
| Refinance: appreciation-created equity | C$218k | C$704k | Market-dependent. It disappears in flat or falling markets. |
| Surplus cash flow redeployed | C$790k | C$665k | Real earned cash above the reserve requirement. |
| Capital turns (total ÷ C$600k) | 1.85× | 2.84× | How many times the starting capital went back to work |
I report every recycled dollar by source. Refinance proceeds are debt, not income.
Stress tests
All new and renewed debt at 6.5% from Year 2.
0% appreciation in Years 1–5, then 3.5%.
7% debt; values down 5% a year in Years 2–3; 10% vacancy; opex up 10%; 5% appraisal haircut.
8% debt; values down about 15%; 20% vacancy for three years; opex up 15%; 10% appraisal haircut.
| Scenario | Strategy | Y10 net worth | 10-yr IRR | Min DSCR | Years below 1.20× |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined | Buy-and-hold | C$1,276k | 7.8% | 1.47× | 0 |
| Combined | Flywheel 5-yr | C$1,481k | 9.5% | 1.28× | 0 |
| Combined | Aggressive 80% | C$1,647k | 10.6% | 1.18× | 4 |
| Severe | Buy-and-hold | C$911k | 4.3% | 1.11× | 9 |
| Severe | Flywheel 5-yr | C$972k | 4.9% | 1.11× | 9 |
| Severe | Aggressive 80% | C$778k | 2.6% | 0.80× | 40 |
In the Severe case the governed flywheels barely refinance and finish close to buy-and-hold. At this cap rate they stay cash-flow positive in almost every year.
The aggressive version has the best base case and the worst Severe result: 40 property-years below a 1.20× lender covenant, and a weakest property at 0.80×.
Short terms reprice into stress sooner. The 3-year cycle does worse than the 5-year in the Combined case because it renews at 7% two years earlier.
Friction points
Over 10 years the 3-year flywheel carries about C$269k of transaction friction, against C$38k for buy-and-hold. Holding safety cash costs about C$63k more. That’s the insurance premium for surviving stress.
How I run it
Who it suits
| If you… | Best fit | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Have strong income, a 10+ year horizon, and will hold reserves | Governed flywheel, 5-year cycle | Most of the upside, with fewer friction events and less repricing exposure |
| Are hands-on, with deal flow and a lender ladder in place | Governed flywheel, 3-year cycle | The highest governed return, but needs active refinance management |
| Want income stability, or plan to retire within 5 years | Leveraged buy-and-hold | LTV falls to about 43% by Year 10; DSCR rises to about 2.1× |
| Have low tolerance for illiquidity, concentration or management | A 60/40 portfolio, or a blend | Lower return, but liquid, diversified and hands-off |
| Want the 80%, every-3-years version | I’ll decline, or reframe it as governed | The extra return is mostly unpriced leverage and liquidity risk |
Next step
Your capital, target market rents, lender quotes and timeline, run through the same model, with your accountant’s sign-off on structure before the first refinance.
Method, limits and sources
An annual simulation with per-loan tracking, monthly compounding and pre-tax, nominal CAD figures. Every 2–4 door property uses the same per-door price, rent and cost economics. The 60/40 benchmark is shown without drawdowns. Debt is modelled at a 5.0% long-term planning rate. Current 5-year fixed rates average about 5.39% (nesto, 29 October 2026), after the Bank of Canada raised its policy rate to 2.50% on 28 October. At 5.4%, Year-10 results fall by about C$0.2M for the flywheels and C$0.05M for buy-and-hold, and the roughly four-point edge holds. Lender-rule inputs are as at 14 October 2026. Surplus cash and reserve yields follow the FP Canada 2026 Projection Assumption Guidelines. Lending limits per OSFI Guideline B-20.
Illustrative, not a forecast, a financing approval or tax advice. For education and discussion only; not individualized financial, legal or tax advice. Past performance does not predict future results. Leverage magnifies losses as well as gains; cash flow can be negative and capital can be lost. Obtain independent advice.